Home › Forums › Infant Reflux Information › Miscellaneous › GERD Not Limited to Grownups article
- This topic has 10 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 17 years, 1 month ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 25, 2007 at 9:45 pm #41683AnonymousInactive
MSN.com had this as one of their headlines tonight. “GERD Not Limited to Grownups”. The actual article came from this website. http://www.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=607428
I appreciate the PR about GERD but wish they had not worded some things the way they did. I wrote an email to the editors on the HealthDay site. I hope I wasn’t out of line, but I found their misuse of “colic” so very frustrating. Here’s what I said:Thank you for bringing this subject to more people’s attention. It is shocking how many doctors do not properly diagnose infant reflux, so many babies suffer when they could actually be receiving treatment for their pain. That was the case for our son. We were told for months that he had “colic” when he actually had GERD and MSPI (milk soy protein intolerance). It took him losing weight and becoming diagnosed as “Failure to Thrive” to finally get proper medical care.So, your article is very helpful in making more people aware of infant reflux. However, you frequently misused the word “colic” where you should have said “reflux” in this article. For example, you said “COLIC is a normal physiologic process that can occur throughout the day in healthy infants and children. Most episodes are brief and are typically confined to the lower esophagus…” That should have been “reflux”. Reflux is a normal process, colic is a description of behaviour. Even if somehow medically the word “colic” is appropriate to use, the public understanding of “colic” is a crying and miserable baby, not a physiological process of bringing the stomach contents back up.
You also said “COLIC can worsen and become GERD when the stomach’s contents move into the upper esophagus.” Again, “reflux” seems to be the correct term.
The third place you misused the word is: “Diagnosing GERD first involves eliminating other conditions with similar symptoms, such as testing for milk or food allergies, COLIC or inflammation of the esophagus, and finding out if there is a family history of GERD.” There is no test for COLIC. COLIC does not inflame the esophagus.
There is no Disease called Colic. It is a description of symptoms and behaviours — many of which babies with reflux display, of course. Most doctors lump too many crying, distressed babies as having “colic” instead of pursuing a more current medical diagnosis – GERD or protein intolerances.
Two other excellent sources of information about infant reflux are http://www.marci-kids.com (a hospital website) and http://www.colicsolved.com (a pediatric GI doctor).
Thanks for listening.
Dianne Wood
August 25, 2007 at 10:10 pm #41684AnonymousInactivewow….they really messed that up. that is pretty annoying! thanks for sending that email!
August 26, 2007 at 7:00 am #41689AnonymousInactiveI think you did a wonderful job of tactfully letting them know how incorrect some of the wording was. I do hope that that letter is available for readers to see as well. Thanks for the link.
August 26, 2007 at 11:28 am #41698hellbenntKeymasterway to go mama!!!
August 28, 2007 at 4:26 pm #41829AnonymousInactiveMan, I am glad you sent that. You’d think that they would have had a few people who knew something about GERD proofread? No? Geez.
August 29, 2007 at 12:17 am #41854AnonymousInactiveWhen I first took my son, who is now 18 months old and who was also diagnosed failure to thrive, to the doctor, he printed out this “great” little sheet titled “Colic”, now now there he will get over it he said. He had no idea, like so many doctors. Go girl, someone has to show them the light!!
August 31, 2007 at 11:37 pm #42006AnonymousInactiveExcellent work
September 2, 2007 at 12:21 am #42057AnonymousInactiveI actually read that article too and thought, well good for getting it out there but not EXACTLY right…
I think your letter is great!TinaSeptember 2, 2007 at 10:20 pm #42087AnonymousInactiveThat’s great!! Have they responded to you at all?? Please keep us posted if they do!
September 2, 2007 at 10:30 pm #42088AnonymousInactiveNo, they haven’t replied and personally, I doubt that they will. Perhaps some of you all could also write a comment to the editors of the article. Maybe the power of many voices would reinforce the point…?
September 6, 2007 at 7:47 pm #42255AnonymousInactiveWow, that was a gross misuse of the term, and a good way to confuse parents more.
Great e-mail -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.